Topic Progress:
Case Study icon green circle

OUR CASE

Katherine was resuscitated in the emergency department and then taken to theatre to have an EVD inserted to manage her hydrocephalus.
A digital subtraction angiogram showed an anterior communicating artery aneurysm amenable to coiling and this was performed with a good result.

When to secure an aneurysm?

As soon as possible, ideally within 24 hours, for the following reasons:

  • Coiling/clipping significantly reduces risk of early rebleed (15% within 24 hours for unsecured ruptured aneurysms)
    • 1/3 of rebleeds occur within 3 hours
    • 1/2 of rebleeds occur within 6 hours
    • After the first day, the subsequent risk is 1.5% daily for 13 days
  • Facilitates treatment of any future vasospasm by allowing higher arterial blood pressure and volume expansion without danger of aneurysm rupture
  • Reduction in overall patient mortality and reduced likelyhood of severe neurological deficit with early intervention (see here)

Endovascular vs surgical management

Therapeutic options include:

1. Endovascular management by interventional neuroradiology

    • Thrombosis of the aneurysm via coiling is most commonly used.
    • Thrombosis by flow diversion, trapping and proximal ligation are other endovascular strategies for securing aneuryms (though less commonly used)

2. Microvascular neurosurgical intervention

    • “Clipping” is the surgical gold standard and by far the most common strategy to secure and aneurysm surgically
    • Other methods including wrapping or coating the aneurysm (not preferred and less common)

Clipping vs coiling

Clipping vs coiling

  • Treatment choice will depend on aneurysm and patient characteristics
  • Multi-disciplinary decision ideally made at centre where both options feasible within 24 hours of ictus
  • There have been four major trials conducted comparing the two methods. The largest of these (ISAT 2002) suggested coiling is preferable (if feasible) due a reduced risk of poor outcome (MRS >2; ARR 7%)
  • Other factors to consider include
    • Technical complications: higher in clipping (19% versus 8%)
    • Late re-bleeding rates: higher in coiled patients (2.9% vs 0.9% after clipping)
    • Complete obliteration of aneurysm higher in clipping (81% versus 58% after coiling)
    • Coiling also associated with lower risk of subsequent epilepsy and cognitive decline and decreased hospital length of stay

Other factors to consider

  • Health care environment / equipment available
  • Skill set and experience of the neurosurgeon / neurointerventionalist

Coiling generally prefered if

  • Older Patients (>40)
  • Low neck:dome ratio (thin neck)
  • Significant comorbidities
  • Basilar or posterior communicating artery aneurysms (hard to clip)
  • Patient is on anticoagulation

Clipping generally preferred if

  • Younger patients (<40) – less risk of recurrence later in life
  • If a craniotomy is happening anyway e.g. for significant clot evacuation
  • Multiple suitable aneurysms

Endovascular Adjuncts

  • NOT USED if either coiling or clipping deemed feasible
  • For ruptured, wide-necked aneurysms which can’t be clipped or coiled. stent-assisted coiling or flow diverting stents are an option
  • For ruptured fusiform / blister aneurysms, low diverting stents are an option
  • Anti-coagulation after flow-diverting stents can be problematic, particularly if an EVD is in situ

How are aneurysms clipped?

Simplified steps involved in clipping an aneurysm:

  • Prepare the patient
  • Perform a craniotomy
  • Expose the aneurysm
  • Deploy the clip
  • Check the clip
  • Close the craniotomy

More here

Click below for a simple video describing one technique:

Aneurysm clipping

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?